Cancelling TV ad buys with two weeks left until the election is certainly not a great sign for Controller Wendy Greuel. Neither is ponying up $100,000 of your own money or having to rely on ads from the Police Protective League and the DWP's powerful union. Even if she manages to resume her own TV spots in the coming days, Greuel is not in a terrific spot perception-wise (we might find out more on Thursday when campaign finance reports are due out). It's more than a little mystifying considering that through April 6 she and opponent Eric Garcetti had raised about the same amount of money. And it's not as if this lifeless campaign has produced any bombshells that typically would put the brakes on contributions. So why should Greuel be in such a financial bind at such a crucial point in the race? The obvious explanation is that the campaign somehow miscalculated, another inexplicable miscue from a candidate (and her team) who held such promise back in the fall. Here are stories from the LAT and KPCC
More by Mark Lacter:
American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAXSocal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent Campaign 2013 stories:
Shallman and Carrick on 'Which Way, LA?' tonight Greuel consultant blames the LA Times
Morning Buzz: Friday 5.24.13
Campaign 2013 photo gallery by Gary Leonard
Election post-mortem in quotes (some very pointed)
New at LA Observed
On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Sign up for daily email from LA Observed