More than one-third of the votes were in opposition to the reelection of Rupert's son to the board - not a great development for someone who has been cast as the media mogul's heir apparent. (Also keep in mind that Murdoch and his family control 40 percent of the voting shares.) Actually, this might provide a convenient opportunity for Rupert to ease his son out of that role. Shareholders did vote overwhelmingly to reelect the old man, though a sizable number of shareholders abstained. (LAT)
More by Mark Lacter:
American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAXSocal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent Hollywood stories:
Obama meets with victims of LAX shooting*THR's Stephen Galloway wins entertainment journalist of the year
Finke, Waxman, Penske, Min: Battle of the Hollywood trades
Photos: AARP Films for Grownups Film Festival
Best thing about next year's Oscars night probably just happened
New at LA Observed
On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Sign up for daily email from LA Observed