Why is this recovery different from all the others (cont'd)

In recessions going back 30 or 40 years, laid off factory workers would get their jobs back once business improved. They would be "recalled." This was especially true in cyclical industries like autos. These days, employers still call them layoffs, but in many cases they're really firings - those jobs will never be recalled. Ed Leamer, director of the UCLA Forecast, says these displacements help explain why the jobs recovery has been so weak. From the new quarterly report:

This time we have experienced a record number of permanent displacements. We have lost another 2.5 million manufacturing jobs, displaced by low-wage foreign workers, skilled robots, and intelligent microprocessors. We have lost 2 million construction jobs that are not coming back again. At the height of the housing boom we were producing 2.2 million housing units while normal is only 1.5 million. That ratio 2.2/1.5 represents excess capacity in homebuilding including approximately 2 million jobs. Also it appears that the retail sector has almost 1 million displaced workers, in part because overshopped consumers are not likely to return to their unsustainable spending levels but also because Internet shopping and information technology in the retail stores are both trimming the retail workforce. In other words, we have as many as 5.5 million workers who are permanently displaced and only about 3 million who are likely to be recalled. ThatÂ’'s a tough problem which is largely unresponsive to the fiscal and monetary medicine we have been taking. It is likely to take a very long time for those 5.5 million displaced workers to find jobs again, and in the meantime the economy will grow, but not as robustly as in traditional recoveries when the recalls were almost 100%.

Bookstore closures are a small but telling example of these displacements. The thousands of people being laid off by the closing of Borders stores - not to mention the countless numbers of independent bookstores - will have a very hard time finding similar work. Yes, time marches on, but in the near term are lots of casualties.


More by Mark Lacter:
American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAX
Socal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent Economy stories:
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Exit interview with Port of L.A.'s executive director
L.A. developers relying on foreign investors bend a few rules
Holiday shopping: On your marks, get set... spend!

New at LA Observed
On the Media Page
Go to Media

On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Arts and culture

Sign up for daily email from LA Observed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Advertisement
Mark Lacter
Mark Lacter created the LA Biz Observed blog in 2006. He posted until the day before his death on Nov. 13, 2013.
 
Mark Lacter, business writer and editor was 59
The multi-talented Mark Lacter
LA Observed on Twitter and Facebook