Badly. Nearly 30 percent of county residents lacked health insurance for at least a portion of 2009, according to a study by UCLA's Center for Health Policy Research. That's 2.7 million non-elderly adults and children. By contrast, Santa Clara was at 19.5 percent; OC 23.3 percent, SF 17.2 percent, and Fresno 24.4 percent. The statewide average was a little over 24 percent. Perhaps more notable is L.A.'s low percentage of job-based coverage: 43.3 percent. In Contra Costa, it's 62.4 percent. Of course, the comparison is not all that valid - L.A.'s economy is diversified, unwieldy, and largely non-corporate. Many transactions are in cash, and employment is often lacking in benefits. That doesn't excuse the troubling numbers, but it does offer a little context.
More by Mark Lacter:
American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAXSocal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent stories:
Letter from Down Under: Welcome to the HomogenoceneOne last Florida photo
Signs of Saturday: No refund
'I Am Woman,' hear them roar
Bobcat crossing
New at LA Observed
On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Sign up for daily email from LA Observed