Demand Media's curious financials

Initial public offerings can be very revealing. When companies go public, they're obliged to file a prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission that contains all kinds of information about revenues and earnings (or losses). Sometimes, there are surprises. When Santa Monica-based Demand Media, the high-profile, well-financed Web content company, filed its IPO, everybody was expecting to see a business that was solidly profitable. That's certainly what co-founder Richard Rosenblatt had been telling reporters for several years. Well, surprise! The company hasn't been profitable since its inception in 2006. Last year it lost $22 million; the year before $14.2 million. From Venture Capital Dispatch:

That's the trouble with privately held companies - no one outside the company can verify a start-up's financial claims. This probably happens more than we know. Liz Gannes, a technology reporter for Malik's GigaOm, wrote about being duped by youth-oriented news company Current Media in 2008 after an IPO filing revealed the company had never been profitable. She wrote: "[U]ntil now, while the company -- which is perhaps best known for being co-founded by Al Gore -- wasn't obligated by the government to tell the world, Current kept telling me it was profitable. Just last week an external PR person pitched me in an email: 'Unlike so many Web 2.0 companies, they're profitable.'" A Current Media spokesperson replied to Gannes' post by saying the company's previous comments about "being profitable" were on an Ebitda basis (excluding non-cash items such as interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization).

Oh. It's possible that Demand Media will wriggle its way out of those previous declarations in much the same way - that is, by saying that the numbers didn't include interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. That's what the dot-com high-fliers often said in the late 90s - and plenty of investors were dumb enough to be suckered in. By the way, Demand Media creates content for a bunch of online brands, most notably eHow. It also makes money by customizing content pages for large Web sites like USAToday.com.


More by Mark Lacter:
American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAX
Socal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent stories:
Letter from Down Under: Welcome to the Homogenocene
One last Florida photo
Signs of Saturday: No refund
'I Am Woman,' hear them roar
Bobcat crossing

New at LA Observed
On the Media Page
Go to Media

On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Arts and culture

Sign up for daily email from LA Observed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Advertisement
Mark Lacter
Mark Lacter created the LA Biz Observed blog in 2006. He posted until the day before his death on Nov. 13, 2013.
 
Mark Lacter, business writer and editor was 59
The multi-talented Mark Lacter
LA Observed on Twitter and Facebook