'Sad day for justice'

We're not talking Madoff or Stanford but the locally based law firm of Irell & Manella, which was slammed by a federal judge in Santa Ana for "ethical failures." It turns out that during their work for Broadcom concerning allegations of stock options manipulation, the firm disclosed privileged information without client consent. Gabe Friedman has been covering the case for the Daily Journal (no link):

Over the years, Irell took on multiple assignments with Broadcom that put its lawyers in the delicate position of representing conflicting interests and clients within the technology company. [CFO William] Ruehle and [founder Henry] Nicholas have been indicted on federal criminal charges for the alleged backdating of stock options, and prosecutors could call Irell attorneys to testify as witnesses against their former clients. Meanwhile, in related civil litigation, a federally appointed lawyer has disparaged Irell for releasing privileged attorney-client information to outside auditors, which has become ammunition in a shareholder lawsuit against former Broadcom executives. Irell & Manella is not facing sanctions, disciplinary referrals or formal malpractice accusations, and the evidence involving the law firm is expected to play a minor role in the federal prosecution against the Broadcom executives. Still, the web of relations and possible conflicts of interest is fraught with complications.

At a hearing, U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney ruled that Irell failed to obtain informed written consent to represent multiple clients with adverse interests and to disclose privileged information. More from the Daily Journal:

The ruling dealt a blow to prosecutors who had hoped to use the conversations to pin down what Ruehle said early on about stock options backdating. They tried to persuade Carney that Ruehle knew Irell would disclose all "factual information" to the auditors, so his conversation with them could not have been privileged. But the judge said his task was to protect Ruehle's Fifth Amendment right. "In a perfect world we wouldn't be here," Carney said. "But because of Irell's mistakes... you're not going to be able to use this as evidence."



More by Mark Lacter:
American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAX
Socal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent stories:
Letter from Down Under: Welcome to the Homogenocene
One last Florida photo
Signs of Saturday: No refund
'I Am Woman,' hear them roar
Bobcat crossing
Previous story: Feds mess up on IndyMac

Next story: Pay model returns

New at LA Observed
On the Media Page
Go to Media

On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Arts and culture

Sign up for daily email from LA Observed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Advertisement
Mark Lacter
Mark Lacter created the LA Biz Observed blog in 2006. He posted until the day before his death on Nov. 13, 2013.
 
Mark Lacter, business writer and editor was 59
The multi-talented Mark Lacter
LA Observed on Twitter and Facebook