The Bratz trial between MGA Entertainment and Mattel goes on. A federal judge turned down MGA's motion for a mistrial in the patent infringement case, despite a juror's reported ethnic slur. The decision was not a surprise - U.S. District Judge Stephen Larson let stand his initial ruling that found the juror's comments didn't impact the decision in favor of Mattel. Now it's back to the penalty phase of the trial, where the question becomes whether Mattel is owed millions of dollars in back royalties or can even claim outright ownership of the doll. The Bratz doll is estimated to generate as much as $1 billion a year. So there’s a lot at stake. (LAT)
More by Mark Lacter:
American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAXSocal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent stories:
Letter from Down Under: Welcome to the HomogenoceneOne last Florida photo
Signs of Saturday: No refund
'I Am Woman,' hear them roar
Bobcat crossing
New at LA Observed
On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Sign up for daily email from LA Observed