Last week, I gave the LAT a hard time for placing the jump to a feature about the retailer H&M opposite a full-page ad for H&M. Well, it's the WSJ's turn. This morning's front page has a below-the-fold story about Kirk Kerkorian wanting to buy another $400 million worth of GM shares and put pressure on the automaker to explore an alliance with Renault and Nissan. Right below the piece, on the bottom right, is a two-column ad for GM, with the headline "A New Level of Confidence." "Maybe they should send it to Kerkorian and tell him to keep his money," writes Douglas A. McIntyre at 24/7 Wall St. It's a dilemma for our times. The Journal doesn't want to give up the mucho bucks that the GM ad will bring in, but the paper's editors don't want to push an important story inside because an advertiser wants placement on P1. Thing is, the Kerkorian disclosure had been on the wires all day Thursday, and the Journal piece doesn't advance the news very much. Why not just throw it on A3 and avoid the unfortunate juxtaposition?
More by Mark Lacter:
American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAXSocal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent stories:
Siri versus Hawaiian pidgin (video)Letter from Down Under: Welcome to the Homogenocene
One last Florida photo
Signs of Saturday: No refund
'I Am Woman,' hear them roar
New at LA Observed
On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Sign up for daily email from LA Observed