More Times talk

Once again, Tim Rutten is on his holier-than-Times rant. This week, he focuses on those money-grubbing Wall Street types who are only after the fattest profit and couldn't care less about Pulitzers or foreign bureaus or anything else having to do with quality journalism - all of which is pretty much true. But so what? What planet has this guy been living on? Putting aside Rutten's naivete about the way business works (Tip: I've found "Understanding Wall Street" by Jeffrey B. Little and Lucien Rhodes to be a good primer), is his ceaseless pomposity about how important the Times is to this community, this nation, this world!

Alone among America's major newspapers, The Times is simultaneously the hometown newspaper of one of the world's great cities, the most important source of news in the nation's richest and most significant state, the leading source of journalism in the country's Western region and a newspaper with national and international reach, particularly in Latin America and along the Pacific Rim.

At the same time, it is Southern California's leading journal of the arts and culture and primary chronicler of the world's most significant laboratory of popular culture: the film industry.

Obviously, The Times plays these roles imperfectly — often inadequately and, sometimes, abysmally — but it cannot abandon any of them without fundamentally breaking faith with its readers, without "devaluing" their relationship with what is, at the end of the day, their newspaper.

Isn't he embarrassed to go on like that? Somebody really needs to throw a few humility pills into the water coolers over there. And as I pointed out last week, why no mention of circulation? If the Times is such an irreplaceable institution, so critical to the lifeblood of the readers it serves, why have 350,000 some-odd subscribers somehow managed to replace it? And many of those before the Tribune boys came marching into town.

Duly noted: After months of ignoring one of the biggest business stories in Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Business Journal (FD: my former employer) finally cranks out a me-too assessment of what the Tribune properties might sell for. There's even a parenthetical mention of the Gang of 20 letter to Tribune execs that included Publisher Matt Toledo. Too bad the story is only available through paid subscription.



More by Mark Lacter:
American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAX
Socal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent stories:
Siri versus Hawaiian pidgin (video)
Letter from Down Under: Welcome to the Homogenocene
One last Florida photo
Signs of Saturday: No refund
'I Am Woman,' hear them roar
Previous story: Country comeback?

Next story: From the weekend papers

New at LA Observed
On the Media Page
Go to Media

On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Arts and culture

Sign up for daily email from LA Observed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Advertisement
Mark Lacter
Mark Lacter created the LA Biz Observed blog in 2006. He posted until the day before his death on Nov. 13, 2013.
 
Mark Lacter, business writer and editor was 59
The multi-talented Mark Lacter
LA Observed on Twitter and Facebook