L.A. lawyer John Marder, whose writer clients have accused the studios of stealing their ideas, gets profiled in Thursday’s New York Times. Marder won a federal appeals court decision that makes it easier for writers to sue. The decision, based on a 2004 case involving Miramax, held that anyone who considers an idea offered for sale can’t rely on the federal Copyright Act in fighting thievery claims. As Marder declared to the Times, “I’ll fight to the death for writers, and I know this part of the law better than anybody.”
More by Mark Lacter:
American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAXSocal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent stories:
Siri versus Hawaiian pidgin (video)Letter from Down Under: Welcome to the Homogenocene
One last Florida photo
Signs of Saturday: No refund
'I Am Woman,' hear them roar
New at LA Observed
On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Sign up for daily email from LA Observed