LAT

Estrich v. Kinsley is back

Most of Howard Kurtz's Media Notes column in today's Washington Post is about the public squabble between Susan Estrich and Michael Kinsley that began as a rift over how many women write for the L.A. Times op-ed page and Opinion section. Kurtz reports that LAT Editor John Carroll wrote Estrich on Feb. 18 to complain about "the extravagant malice of your comments about Mike Kinsley." Estrich responded, Kurtz says, by accusing him of "constitutionally impermissible libel." In the piece, Estrich says that she did not intend her email exchange with Kinsley to become public and says it's not personal: "This isn't about egos. My only concern is that the L.A. Times opinion pages, unfortunately like too many in this country, are dominated by men, and I'd like to see that change." On her website, Estrich appears to be updating the count of op-ed stories by sex of the writer.

Kurtz link via Romenesko

Previously:
Kinsley takes another round
Estrich threatens libel suit
Estrich v. Kinsley gets nasty


More by Kevin Roderick:
Standing up to Harvey Weinstein
The Media
LA Times gets a top editor with nothing but questions
LA Observed Notes: Harvey Weinstein stripped bare
LA Observed Notes: Photos of the homeless, photos that found homes
Recent LAT stories on LA Observed:
LA Times gets a top editor with nothing but questions
LA Observed Notes: Harvey Weinstein stripped bare
Why the LA Times' new theater column needs a new name
Helping in Houston, new lion cubs, Garcetti's back
Memo: New LA Times publisher drops web widget
Warren Olney leaving KCRW's radio lineup
LA Times purge 'capped a month of newsroom turmoil'
As the L.A. Times turns ...
Previous story: Campaign Monday *

Next story: 'Distinguished journos'


 

LA Observed on Twitter